TEDYouth

Conference dates: November 19-21, 2011

I love that middle and high school students (going by appearance) had a chance to share their voices and projects at this recent event, and that the speakers were specifically oriented towards STEM education in grades 6-12.  Most of the TED talks that I have seen for CTER have been from Sir Ken Robinson or similar theorists who – while they offer funny jokes or mind-expanding insights – do not offer too much to the teacher that is looking for an answer to use tomorrow.  Robinson tells us that degrees do not matter; however, someone with a B.A. in ECE will not have the same chance at a hiring event for a Fortune 500 company that is geared towards MBA’s in marketing or accounting.  So there is quite a gap to be bridged

The TED talks from this event will be released on the  TED-ED site in 2012.

“Play, Learn, Build and Share” was the theme of this event, and many of the speakers were focused on robotics, careers and STEM pipeline subjects.

http://tedxyouthday.ted.com/

List of speakers:

http://www.ted.com/pages/tedyouth

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

STEM for kindergarten

http://www.youtube.com/v/FjYbcAyF4yA

I’m talking about expanding the STEM model as a way to introduce more applied learning and crossing disciplines to combine the development of multiple skills at once – including literacy and mathematics – to strengthen overall learning and understanding.

STEM is largely available in high schools, but not so much at the younger level.  Concerns I have as one who has worked with this age group for  6 years is that, while they enjoy hands-on exploration and science experiments – especially ones with easily observable phenomena such as floating/sinking – the math concepts behind them are still hard to grasp at this age because they are so abstract.  A child can “group” (count a pile of 3 toys plus 5 toys to make 8 ) but cannot really add yet; the cuseinaire rods are being stacked rather than used to determine base10 or measure.

That being said, I think there is much to be made of this unique, eclectic means of combining multiple subjects within a themed unit or activity.  It follows what I’ve been trying for in the curriculum I develop at my charter school, starting with letters and using literacy to help bridge into math, science and technology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

STEM tie-in: Migrating Robot

Includes lesson plan and diagram, as well as programming and how to build. Link to buy sensor.

It’s simple and the sensor that is used is not part of the standard Mindstorms kit, but I thought that this was an interesting way to combine robotics and biology within a single lesson.

Migration, to many observers, is about finding warmth; this proposes that the animals are, instead, seeking magnetic north by being sensitive to magnetic forces.  That it is used by sea turtles, birds, bats and fish – by this article – opens the door wide open.. This robot would be a great way to incorporate technology while offering a practical model for students to watch animal behavior as the robot swivels around when picking up on the magnetic field and then aligns itself with the compass as a migrant animal would with the poles.

The robots I created with the summer camp that I ran five years ago sensed motion and color (by light intensity) but were not such practical models.

Mindstorms itself is great because it is a familiar medium (Lego bricks), the drag-and-drop programming allows non-MIT grads to successfully create a working robot that comes to “life” and there is real math involved, from creating booleans and vectors to timing events triggered by equations.

http://www.vernier.com/experiments/stem2/18/migrating_robot/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Newspaper: Autism education

http://tweetedtimes.com/#!/search/autism%20education/en

After I finish this CTER program in March, I want to follow with a doctorate in cognitive neuroscience.  Electroportation, children with early strokes, Autism and Williams Syndrome have been a big research interests for some time, as I have worked with several children who’ve been diagnosed with them.  Understanding the extent of the diagnosis and what is needed to help them attain a similar skill set and find success with peers or in school is about identifying parallel needs and bridging from them. (This is where a background in educational psych and digital media will be helpful, I hope).

The people and organizations I’m following on Twitter include Holly Robinson Peete (@hollyrpeete), Autism Speaks (@autismspeaks), HollyRod4Kids (@hollyrod4kids)  and AutismClassroom.com (@autismclassroom) – all of whom are strong advocates for inclusion and awareness.   Lumosity (@lumosity) is specifically oriented towards neuroscience. Holly Robinson Peete was unknown to me before I watched her place second on The Celebrity Apprentice, but she became one to watch with her empowering work to further understanding and acceptance of children with autism.  Her own Twitter feed provides lots of great resources, so check it out.

As not all of these resources are directly aimed at classroom education,  I found it best to create a tool just from a Boolean search, “autism AND education” rather than having every person  I follow pop up on my paper.

Tweeted Times worked better for me than Paper.li.  It is updated more often and is more customizable; Paper.li is harder to adjust and is updated only once every 24 hrs.   As far as set-up goes, Tweeted times is also a lot more straightforward for a Twitter newbie like myself.  It is a better tool for classroom use, I think, because there are better filters and it has rapid updates.  You can easily weed out posts.

I could definitely see myself creating a Tweeted Times with articles on early childhood education or do-at-home projects, as a way to help bridge the communication gap between my students and their parents.  It could also give them some curriculum-like resources or seasonal projects to work through together during long breaks from school, like our winter and spring holidays.

Curation strengths:

  • Easy access to your own page that synthesizes the “RSS”-type feeds of multiple sources, for fast reading and cross-comparison
  • Free and quick to set up
  • Creates a useful resource with more constant updating that takes place on its own than a personal website where you would constantly have to input your own code

Curation weakness or areas to fix:

  • Rate of updates can be slow
  • Lack of personal control over what the people you follow are posting. Not everything may be about education, or suited for all audiences.  Thus, a keyword-based feed is better than simply flashing the tweets of everyone you follow.
  • Technology and social media are sometimes difficult to get administrative approval for, so not all classrooms could have students create their own papers.  It would have to be a teacher’s resource designed for them, rather than a research engine they could build as a PLE on school time.
  • If they cannot use social media and access Twitter in school, then they could not create their own Twitter-based feed! Such a shame.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Early Literacy: Storybird

Read “The Song of Us”

The application I was most attracted to was Storybird, a program that had possibilities for my Pre-K classroom.  Others, such as Delicious and Zocaroo, are very Internet researched-based; as most students at this grade are still working on getting down first sounds and recognizing sight words, these would not make sense for them and they could not navigate independently.

 What is it? 

Storybird is a free program that allows users to create their own online storybooks by clicking and dragging illustrations into panes and adding text.  Although you cannot combine artwork from different genres or upload your own images (unless you have a juried “Artist” account), there are a wide variety of images to choose from, ranging in appeal for grades from PreK-8, at least. Viewing the book online is free and you can self-publish instantly; to order a high-quality PDF download or a hard copy of the book costs a reasonable fee, from $1.99 for a single PDF download to $34.99 for a hardback book, 9 x 12”.

For Teachers: One can create a teacher account for free (for up to 30 students) and upload a spreadsheet or individual student names to create an account for each child.  You can email reminders and lead fundraisers online, or facilitate discussion in your personal message board.

Development: A challenge in finding appropriate literature for my classroom is finding just the right themes and illustrations that are relatable to the children on a personal level.  Many picture books feature ideas that are above their heads, even though the art is appealing.  The text itself should get ideas across and not to be too repetitive (something characteristic of younger literature, i.e. 0-3), but make clever use of wordplay and rhyming.  Rhyming sounds are good for discussion because they help students at this age recognize how similar spellings produce the same sound and it makes them easier to remember when reading the text aloud.

The book I created, “Song Of Us,” is loosely autobiographical in that my father was the one who put us to bed at night and read stories to us.   My story also reeks of southeastern Ohio, with mention of the Montgomery County Fair (MontCo Fair to locals) and a more ruralized, suburban feel.  –I grew up in suburban Cincinnati, where there were still some recreational farmers and lots of green spaces that were underdeveloped.

This artifact was specifically designed with assessment in mind; I knew I would share it with my class and use their responses and interest to help shape this entry.  I had hoped that not giving first names to any of the characters and making the dialogue more script-like, without actions like “shouted” or “cried” would lead to a more psychological discussion about feelings.  (Our unit is “C for Character, D for Daily Me!”)

 Implementation: After my first reading, all but two raised their hands and said they enjoyed the book (aww, thanks, Guys!)  With it closed, though, they remembered it was about a child and her family but did not know other details.  All but a few could not name her emotions, when asked “What’s one thing that she felt?”

Paging through slowly and leading Q&A for a deep reading of each image elicited strong responses and they inferred a lot of details from their own life.  I also added their own words and dialogue to a print copy.  Many transposed the idea of a Hallowe’en story over my text; while on Page 3 there is a figure that could be a toy or a monster, this was an interesting extension.  Their reasoning? The time of year that I was reading this in, and the fall foliage – so it must be a Hallowe’en story.

When allowed to play with the application, they were attracted to its bright colors and images; however, a detractor was that, for all but two, a teacher had to take down a story dictation.  The two who could spell independently (and with a high degree of accuracy) did so in all caps – to make it more readable for the age and let them self-correct.

Their stories were autobiographical, perhaps following my example; many also went for a Hallowe’en theme or talked about time spent with just one parent.  When asked, one girl said, “It’s what I saw.”  Another child used the same picture I did for the bedroom (Page 2) and said, “But If I could redraw it, I’d add in some moving boxes.  Mom was lazy and everything’s still “gone.”  – Lili just moved house a week and a half ago, and many of her toys and clothes probably are still “gone” or put away.

 The Verdict: Storybird showed itself to be a very engaging program that fuels the need to create at even the earliest grade levels.  Strong images and bright colors provide great triggers for memory recall and connecting ideas, echoing the need for concrete evidence at this age.  Having an image and needing to explain the how and why encourages vocabulary development and critical reading of a body of work, combining left- and right-brained activity.

Because searchable stories and message boards are moderated for content and children under 13 are able to have their own accounts (with parental permission through an activation email), a teacher can be sure that this environment is kept secure. Easy layout and tools mean that children can do it on their own, with confidence.    I also like the course cross-listing feature of the Pro + account that encourages online interaction and collaborative story building with other classes and programs.  Social constructivism at the early ed level!

 Changes I’d make for this environment (PreK-3): Being able to upload artwork at all account levels would make for an even richer experience, and a greater keepsake if a parent were to buy the child’s book.  I could also include it as an application for the art students, on a deeper level.  (At this stage, I would only ask them to examine images of a certain style, a specific medium, or to emulate a movement we were studying.)

As for logistics itself, additional font sizes would be nice.  The current size in the editor window is more for a child of 7 who was able to read beginner chapter books. Having the option of plainer fonts would also, at the early grades, reduce letter confusion and boost confidence when reading and writing because of the blocky, easy shapes. – The unchangeable, default font is a slightly modified version of Garamond.

  • Free to make and read online!
  • Affordable options for downloading ebook or print format
  • Completely customizable, except for font style/size and cannot upload own artwork
  • Class management features including online assignments and grading
  • Easy community to enter into for online collaborations between schools and organizations
  • Kid-friendly, with drag-and-drop editing

Boosts:

  • Vocabulary building and language fluency
  • Abstract reasoning
  • Creative writing and expository skills
  • Digital literacy

Additional paid features:

  • Add up to 150 students
  • Online grading
  • 20 free downloads for finished books
  • Cross-list and interact with other classes through their Storybird programs

Great for: PreK-8


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Changes in Content vs. Modality as we near the future

The needs of my art students and my Pre-K kids are very different in terms of technology and computer literacy.  Many of the Pre-K students are not yet reading independently (something I’ll start to see around January, or even in Kindergarten.)  Right now, the games I make for them through Powerpoint, Clicker5 and with java applets (I know how to program on a basic level) involve analysis and constructing meaning through puzzle-like games that welcome user input, such as text to talk and manipulating word cards like an adult’s magnetic poetry.  They are invited to print out what they make and share it in this constructive environment.  Art curriculum makes use of technological media, including graphic design and digital paint programs that involve vectors and fractals.  Drawing celled animation encourages them to imagine different views and they can explore the 3D nature of space before making paper models.

In 2025, assuming this astronomical jump in technological integration improves, I would expect some video conferencing with other classrooms in shared activities – be it in the same district, same state or even on the other side of the world.  More tablet activities would be nice and I would expect tablets to replace most pens and paper.  The tablets themselves would become slimmer and simply readers of programs held within a cloud network.  Curriculum standards will continue to incorporate core disciplines, but the nature of the class itself will change with more electronic media and synchronized transition of ideas within the main frame of a class on a SMARTboard with children transmitting answers, i.e. via Bluetooth, increasingly to build representations and add to a teacher’s framework.

I would also expect a unified approach to teaching that incorporates multiple subject areas and involves programming as constructivism to help enhance problem-solving skills.

Where would this take Pre-K? At this level, I would expect even more text-to-voice and interactivity, with 3D modeling for science and art units. Rotating models and figures, including 3D geo solids, would enable exploration of materials not immediately in their physical environment.

Math abilities and the level of literacy needed for programming represent a threshold not all have reached at this age.  Ergo, the fundamentals of literacy and phonetic education could be enhanced with media – but it might not make sense to do a full replacement of the modality of their instruction as with higher grades,  in which students have already attained the cognitive abilities to understand algorithms and read/synthesize larger bodies of text.

-This video models usage of a SMARTboard in visiting a text-talk program for teaching phonics; the website is http://www.starfall.com.  Just a glimpse of future capabilities for technology integration at even the earliest grades!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

IC #3

Making it Click

Posting my presentation materials here, in case you – as do I – want to go back and review everyone’s to appreciate the work and get ideas.   (Plus, we’ve seen Moodle can go down.)

There is so much to adapt for our own practice, even from people outside of our own content areas.

Enjoy!  Write me at hurstr2@hotmail.com if you have any questions!!

Website: http://www.rhurst3-cter.homestead.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gates has done it again

-this time, in a way that immediately helps our content area.

Next Generation Learning Standards, a new grant program, is now furnishing grants to schools for integrating digital learning and new technology.  One was recently received by Bryn Mawr to introduce open-source applets to enhance math and science courses, through a network of 34 other liberal arts schools. +

Even if you aren’t making a grant proposal – just 29 out of 600 were accepted in the latest wave of funding – this site has a lot of interesting articles and forum posts about movements in curriculum reform (including the Core Curriculum Standards, adapted by all 50 states, which were introduced in June of last year) and online learning.

As for the Core Curriculum Standards themselves, computers are mandated in literacy only for special needs students as a means of assistive technology – and, in math, for “algebra computing” as a tool or for graphic design.

We really do need to embrace our role as game-changers within our own content areas and classroom practice – and approach our administration on ways to integrate technology within our teaching teams, even if we cannot yet rewrite state curriculum standards.

+ Read article: Grant Allows Bryn Mawr to Explore Blend of Online Learning and Liberal-Arts Classroom Instruction.   Bryn Mawr Now. Retrieved: April 7th, 2011

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Low Tide for Schools

Articles like this one about reduced funding for schools are sad for me – especially after so many upgrades were just made!  (This article was one that initially came up in a SMARTboard search, but did not fit the tone of what I put together for the Techstanding.)

 When we cut into our children’s future like this – even at the preschool level – we are saving a dime on taxes in the short run, but limiting their potential by not giving them the resources they need to stay competitive or reach self-fulfillment, even so much as reducing their chances to practice social skills and being part of a group, which would ease their transition into public school.

 This comes along with other ideas that were bandied about in fall of last year with respect to Georgia schools – as in Atlanta, a move was made that would limit the school week to four days instead of five.  Would those students be able to keep up with their peers on a nationwide level, when it came to comparison SAT scores or college performance?

 I think I’d rather pay a little bit more in taxes (read: A LITTLE BIT!  This is Cook County!)

 Read article:

 Concerns about Cuts to Pre-K Program/ Savannah, Georgia

http://www2.wsav.com/news/2011/mar/03/concerns-about-cuts-pre-k-program-ar-1534378/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Techstanding #2: iLearn

When given a chance to renovate a room with $150,000 to create a dream classroom of tomorrow with class sets of the innovative technologies and program applications now available for educational use, the best candidate for this extreme makeover is the art room in the basement.  It is currently used only for art supply storage and once a month for art history lectures (mainly slide shows) put on by an adjunct instructor from the Art Institute of Chicago.  The room is spacious and has a wall of windows, which let in welcoming sunlight – but the paint is peeling and it was last used for general class activities in the early 80s, before St. Mary’s stopped using it as a Catholic school for its parish and began leasing it to us for our charter school.  Cinder block walls, linoleum and old furniture are all that are in there – and this room could use a fresh breath of air.

It is fitting that this art room become a new place of creativity, which I dub iLearn – referencing the Apple products we will be using, as well as encouraging teachers and students to see this as their own, self-created world for creativity and interactive learning.

Current enrollment is at 20 per room, with each room led by a teaching team of a Type 04 or B.A. –qualified lead teacher and an assistant teacher.  This space, therefore, is designed for a class of 20 as well as having two additional stations specifically modified to accommodate students with special needs – as our program includes several who are deaf or have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.

The addition of a part- or full-time iLearn media specialist to perform IT services and provide instructional support to classes as they rotate in and out of iLearn will not only put teachers who are less familiar with computers and technology at ease, but provide the center with a general assistant who is trained in their capabilities and can perform routine upkeep as needed.

Classrooms in a multitude of other school districts have “gone digital,” or upgraded to allow their students to experience education using the highest technologies available now.  This has shaped the face of education today by  changing the game from traditional circle activities and paper-and-pencil seatwork to include multimedia experiences that stimulate the imagination and help keep the attention of their students.

The Osakis Public School district in Minnesota has put Smart Boards in nearly all of the classrooms, and they are actively used in grades as young as kindergarten.  The activities led on the boards range from music (reading and playing back) to shuffling word flash cards and spinning objects to get a better view of them in science and math (Chaffins).

Similar systems have been incorporated into a kindergarten classroom at Walker School in Canton, OH – where the board is used daily for language arts, morning calendar and math activities – and at Cannon School in Concord, North Carolina, where the Pre-K rooms have been equipped with Smart Boards, Smart Tables and iPads to enhance instruction. (Price)  Incorporating applications into classroom teaching, like this, bridges the gap between traditional methods and the ways in which students learn today – as well as enhancing their digital or computer literacy, to prepare them for the years to come.

Additional benefits to SMART Board technological integration into schools ts that they allow all students to learn at an equal level, even if they have special needs, because of the much larger format and the ability for children with limited mobility skills to manipulate objects with finger touch if unable to use a mouse.  “Talking board” elements also allow those with speech or hearing problems to communicate with fellow classmates with a greater degree of freedom (Downing).

In presenting this proposal to my administration and the board, I would place emphasis on the benefits of having interactive technology in the preschool and kindergarten programs along constructivist pedagogy, with children producing their learning through working models and then getting immediate feedback and response – particularly with the programmed SMARTboards and iPads, as seen in Cannon School in Concord.  The integration will help unify the curriculum as presented throughout the preK and K levels, and bring more technological awareness and digital literacy into the lives of our students – and at earlier level, which increases the benefits of this digital literacy as they enter the state schools and state programs.

Putting iLearn into a currently unused room, the art room, makes better use of the existing space by creating a welcoming environment for learning to take place – and literally remodels our school by placing a new focus on interactive media and teaching, in a way that integrates neatly into existing practice in the classrooms.

In addition, the integration of these technologies into our school will help us fulfill the Illinois Learning Standards and NAEYC accreditation criteria – both of which must be met by our school as part of a public district and, for preschool and pre-kindergarten, is NAEYC accredited.  According to the Illinois standards, all science students need access to computer hardware to enhance their understanding of technology’s place in society and science, as well as its function.  The NAEYC criteria directly calling for technology in the classroom include Cri. 2.H.02, which requires that all children have access to technology that they can use independently, with peers or a teacher, and Cri. 2.H.03, which states that technology must be used to extend learning in the classroom and enrich the curriculum.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment